Adjusting Tornado Damage by Era

(Updated 30 March 2000)
Send comments to Harold Brooks

Through time, tornado damage values have increased in the United States.  This is not because tornadoes have become more violent, but because of inflation and the accumulation of weath.  Here are a couple of ways of looking at the most damaging tornadoes accounting for the these changes.  The first takes into account only inflation (inflation adjusted damage) and the second also includes an adjustment for the accumulation of possessions (wealth adjusted damage).


U.S. Tornadoes Ranked by Inflation Adjusted Damage

The costs of tornado damage has increased over the years at the same time as inflation has increased prices.  I've used the Consumer Price Index to adjust the damage from tornadoes to constant (1997) dollars.  The table below shows the 15 most damaging tornadoes since 1860 after adjusting for inflation.
 
Rank
Date
Location
Dead
Raw
Damage
($M)
Inflation
Adjusted
Damage
1
3-May-1999
Oklahoma City, OK
36
1000
963.4
2
10-Apr-1979
WichitaFalls, TX
45
400
884.0
3
6-May-1975
Omaha,  NE
3
250
745.0
4
11-May-1970
Lubbock, TX
28
135
558.0
5
8-Jun-1966
Topeka, KS
16
100
494.0
6
3-Oct-1979
Windsor Locks, CT
3
200
442.0
7
27-May-1896
St. Louis, MO-E. St. Louis, IL
255
12
380.0
8
3-Apr-1974
Xenia, OH
34
100
325.0
9
31-Mar-1973
Conyers, GA
1
89
321.0
10
9-Jun-1953
Worcester, MA
94
52
311.0
11
3-Jun-1980
GrandIsland, NE
4
140
273.0
12
11-May-1953
Waco, TX
114
41
246.0
13
3-Dec-1978
BossierCity, LA
2
100
246.0
14
20-May-1957
RuskinHeights, MO
44
40
228.0
15T
29-Sep-1927
St.Louis, MO
79
22
203.0
15T
28-Aug-1990
Plainfield, IL
29
165
203.0


U.S. Tornadoes Ranked by Wealth Adjusted Damage

We can also adjust damage across eras by taking into account the total wealth of the country.  It increases not only because of inflation, but also because people tend to have more possessions as time goes on.  This is slightly more complicated than the inflation adjustment, so it's probably a good idea to check out the methodology.  Four values are given for tornadoes before 1925 and after 1997, the period when good data have been published.  Those values represent Est. 3 is probably the most accurate, but I've chosen to do the basic comparsions via the most conservative (inflation-only) model in order to lessen exaggeration associated with the modelling.

All dollar values are given in millions of 1997 dollars. The total wealth of the US in 1997 was approximately $25,000,000,000.  As a comparison, if we take the most likely value of the 1896 Saint Louis damage as $3574 million dollars, that damage represented 0.014% of the total wealth of the United States.
 
 
Rank
Date
Location
Dead
Raw
Damage
($M)
Wealth
Adjusted
Damage
Est. 2
(10%ile)
Est. 3
(25th%)
Est. 4
(50%ile)
1
27-May-1896
St. Louis, MO - E. St. Louis, IL
255
12
2166.8
2739.8
3574.0
6377.8
2
29-Sep-1927
St. Louis, MO
79
22
1794.4
3
18-Mar-1925
Tri-State (MO-IL-IN)
695
16
1392.3
4
10-Apr-1979
Wichita Falls, TX
45
400
1140.7
5
9-Jun-1953
Worcester, MA
94
52
1140.3
6
6-May-1975
Omaha, NE
3
250
1126.8
7
8-Jun-1966
Topeka, KS
16
100
1126.1
8
6-Apr-1936
Gainesville, GA
203
13
1111.3
9
11-May-1970
Lubbock, TX
28
135
1080.8
10
28-Jun-1924
Lorain-Sandusky, OH
85
12
1070.7
1079.5
1089.5
1111.4
11
3-May-1999
Oklahoma City, OK
36
1000
963.4
933.5
915.2
875.4
12
11-May-1953
Waco, TX
114
41
899.1
13
23-Mar-1913
Omaha, NE
103
5
769.1
648.5
723.9
920.0
14
23-Jun-1944
Southwestern PA
30
15
696.6
15
20-May-1957
Ruskin Heights, MO
44
40
685.1