Surface Wetness
Surface temperature over land is estimated from
GOES-10/12
sounder retrievals in near real-time at CIMSS. These estimates
approximate
the radiometric temperature and emissivity where sky conditions are
clear.
Previous work by Diak et al. (1995), Rabin et al. (2000), and others
have shown the utility of
daytime heating rates of radiometric temperature in estimating daytime
sensible heat flux. The heating rate is obtained by differencing
the temperature near its peak in the afternoon from that near
sunrise.
(Ideally, the
temperature difference should be based on fixed solar times at all
locations.
However, for simplicity, 21 -12 UTC has been used. The results
appear
to be relatively insensitive to varying the beginning and ending times
by as much as 2-3 hours). Using the difference in temperature rather
than an average daytime temperature
reduces some of the possible errors associated with the temperature
estimate
from satellite.
The measured heating rates are also inversely related to surface
wetness as follows:
1) The amount of surface heating is reduced over wet surfaces and
locations with active vegetation and adequate root zone moisture.
2) Surface heating increases with drier surfaces where surface
evaporation and evapotransporation from vegetation is limited.
Hence, the measured heating rates may be used to assess the surface wetness. In a previous study based on data from 1999-2201, heating rates were compared to soil moisture anomalies (from the NOAA Climate Prediction Center) and Vegetation Health (obtained from Felix Kogan at NOAA/NESDIS). In general, many of the soil moisture anomalies could be detected in the analysis of heating rates from satellite on a monthly time scale. See this link for more details. It appears that the infrared heating rates may have an advantage over available microwave estimates (from SSM/I) in being able to distinguish varying degrees of dryness. (The microwave observations are mainly sensitive to very wet surfaces).
Two products are shown here:
Absolute
Heating Rates. These images derived from GOES data
are color enhanced to emphasis the surface wetness in an absolute
sense. The smaller rates are indicated in green (wet) and the
largest rates in yellow and white (dry). In the mean, the images may be
related to an absolute measure of soil moisture from the contoured maps
of the Climate
Prediction Center. The soil moisture is based on
precipitation and temperature data by NCDC climate
divisions and a one-layer hydrological model ( Huang
et al., 1996). Precipitation measurements are from the
cooperative
surface network and other observations. Hence, the satellite
product should be expected to contain more detail (because of its 10 km
resolution). Differences with the modeled soil moisture may also
occur due to the model residence time of soil moisture and effects of
vegetation not included in the hydrologic model.
Heating Rate Anomalies. These are deviations of the absolute heating rate from monthly mean heating rate from the 3-year mean (1999-2001). Smaller than average heating rates are indicated in green (anomalously wet), larger than average rates in cyan (anomalously dry). The maps of heating rate anomalies can be compared with soil moisture anomalies from the Climate Prediction Center. These are based on departures from the 1971-2000 year mean.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Soil moisture (CPC model) |
X |
X |
|
| Soil moisture anomaly (CPC model) |
X |
X |
| Period |
01-07 June |
08-14 June |
15-21 June |
22-28 June |
29 June-5 July |
06-12 July |
13-19 July |
20-26 July |
27 July-02 Aug |
03-09 Aug |
10-16 Aug |
17-23 Aug |
24-30 Aug |
| Absolute |
X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Anomaly |
X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Period |
Yesterday |
Weekly
average (last 7-days) |
| Absolute |
X | X |
| Anomaly |
X | X |
| Soil moisture (CPC model) |
X |
|
| Soil moisture anomaly (CPC model) |
X |
References:
Diak, G.R., R.M. Rabin, K.P. Gallo, C.M. Neale, 1995: Regional-scale comparisons of NDVI, soil moisture indices from surface and microwave data and surface energy budgets evaluated from satellite and in-situ data. Remote Sensing Reviews, 12, 355-382.
Huang, J., H. van den Dool, K.P. Georgakakos, 1996: Analysis of model-calculated soil moisture over the United States (1931-93) and application to long-range temperature forecasts. Journal of Climate, 9, No. 6,
Kogan, F.N., 1997: Global drought watch from space. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78, 621-636.
Rabin, R.M., B. Burns, C. Collimore, G. R. Diak,
W. Raymond, 2000: Relating remotely-sensed vegetation and soil moisture
indices to surface energy fluxes in vicinity of an atmospheric dryline.
Remote Sensing Reviews, 18, 53-82.